Compare the basic architecture of a Wayland session with X11.
Which description is appropriate?
A Wayland compositor combines display-server and window-management roles; X11 applications can often run through XWayland.
Detailed explanation
Incorrect. Wayland does not assume the same built-in network transparency model as X11.
Incorrect. Wayland does not assume the same built-in network transparency model as X11.
Incorrect. Wayland is a separate display protocol, not an Xorg configuration-file alias.
Incorrect. Wayland is a separate display protocol, not an Xorg configuration-file alias.
Incorrect. XWayland provides compatibility for many X11 clients.
Incorrect. XWayland provides compatibility for many X11 clients.
Correct. The compositor handles protocol clients, composition, and window management.
Correct. The compositor handles protocol clients, composition, and window management.
Try it yourself
An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.
printf '%s\n' 'Wayland compositor: display protocol + composition' 'XWayland: X11 compatibility'Expected result
WaylandコンポジターとXWaylandの役割を表示Key points
- Separate protocol
- Compositor is central
- XWayland compatibility
Notes
- Environment: Waylandアーキテクチャの概念確認
- Command output formatting can vary slightly by distribution or tool version.
- Run the example in a temporary directory or process when possible.
Foundation review
Read the scope first
Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.
Verify the observable result
Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.