Tests succeed, but an operations owner must approve the production stage.
Keep the approval decision and comments in the pipeline history.
Which feature is most appropriate?
Add a Manual approval action to the CodePipeline stage before production deployment.
Detailed explanation
A DNS record does not pause or resume a pipeline.
A DNS record does not pause or resume a pipeline.
CDN operations are not a CI/CD approval gate.
CDN operations are not a CI/CD approval gate.
The pipeline pauses at the stage and records the approver and comments before continuing.
The pipeline pauses at the stage and records the approver and comments before continuing.
This loses the pipeline's audit trail and repeatability.
This loses the pipeline's audit trail and repeatability.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
AWS CodePipeline manual approval actionsの公式説明を確認する。
What to confirm
自動テストと手動承認ステージを組み合わせられる。
Key points
- Manual approval
- CodePipeline
- Approval gate
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式SOA-C03試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Confirm current AWS service behavior in the official documentation.
Foundation review
Human control
A manual gate adds an intentional review between automated tests and production.
Auditability
The decision, approver, and comment remain part of the pipeline execution history.