Operators need one view of ingestion, latency, failures, and cost.
The view should link to detailed logs for investigation.
Which monitoring approach is most appropriate?
Use a CloudWatch Dashboard with aligned time ranges, key metrics, metric math, and links to correlated log queries.
Detailed explanation
API events do not show latency, quality, or cost health.
API events do not show latency, quality, or cost health.
A shared time axis gives operators a consistent starting point across services.
A shared time axis gives operators a consistent starting point across services.
A screenshot is not real-time monitoring or an alarm.
A screenshot is not real-time monitoring or an alarm.
Separate views slow triage and make time correlation difficult.
Separate views slow triage and make time correlation difficult.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
Amazon CloudWatch dashboards、widgets、metric mathの公式説明を確認する。
What to confirm
横断ダッシュボードと個別コンソール巡回の運用差を説明できる。
Key points
- Dashboard
- Metric math
- Correlation ID
- Incident triage
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式DEA-C01試験ガイドと各サービスの公式ドキュメントの確認
- Confirm current AWS service behavior in the official DEA-C01 documentation.
Foundation review
Consistent view
Use matching time range, units, and time zone to avoid misleading comparisons.
Drill-down
Start with an overview, then follow execution IDs and runbooks to Logs Insights.