An AI support feature uses voice and a screen.
People with disabilities must be able to inspect results.
Which review is most appropriate?
Test alternative text, keyboard use, captions, speech output, contrast, and error explanations with real interaction paths.
Detailed explanation
Both operation and results remain accessible.
Both operation and results remain accessible.
Accuracy does not guarantee perception or operation.
Accuracy does not guarantee perception or operation.
Available interaction paths are restricted.
Available interaction paths are restricted.
Barriers remain after release.
Barriers remain after release.
Try it yourself
An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.3の責任あるAI、利用者への影響、アクセシビリティを確認する。Expected result
AIの性能評価と、利用者が結果へアクセスできる評価を分けて実施できる。Key points
- Accessibility
- Alternatives
- Usability testing
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Command output formatting can vary slightly by distribution or tool version.
- Run the example in a temporary directory or process when possible.
Foundation review
Read the scope first
Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.
Verify the observable result
Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.