4.2Basic
An AI support feature uses voice and a screen.
People with disabilities must be able to inspect results.
Which review is most appropriate?
× Incorrect
Test alternative text, keyboard use, captions, speech output, contrast, and error explanations with real interaction paths.
Detailed explanation
CorrectTest alternative text, keyboard use, captions, speech output, contrast, and error explanations
Both operation and results remain accessible.
IncorrectWait for complaints before testing
Barriers remain after release.
IncorrectOffer voice only without a text or visual alternative
Available interaction paths are restricted.
IncorrectTreat high model accuracy as accessibility compliance
Accuracy does not guarantee perception or operation.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4の責任あるAI、利用者への影響、アクセシビリティを確認する。
Official references
What to confirm
AIの性能評価と、利用者が結果へアクセスできる評価を分けて実施できる。
Key points
- Accessibility
- Alternatives
- Usability testing
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Compare the definition with the AIF-C01 objective and the service documentation before applying it.
- Keep the concept separate from a particular answer choice or implementation step.
Foundation review
Accessibility
The degree to which people with varied abilities can use a product or service.
Alternative mode
A different input, output, or interaction path serving the same task.
Question IDAWS-AIF-547
EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
Last technical review2026-08-20
Report an error or rights issue