Separating AI governance roles | AWS Certified AI Practitioner (AIF-C01) original practice question

4.3Basic

Model, data, business, and security owners differ.

Prevent responsibility gaps.

Choose two practices.

Hint 1: Focus on the requirement

Identify what must change and what must remain unchanged. Then choose the command whose scope matches that requirement.

Hint 2: Check each command's role

Separate commands that display information, change state, remove data, or affect a child process.

所有者、承認者、運用者、データ管理者、リスク・法務窓口の責任を文書化する: Decision paths are clear.
高影響用途の導入・変更・停止・再開に必要な承認とエスカレーションを定義する: Important decisions are controlled.
担当が多いほど誰も最終責任を持たなくてよい: Responsibility becomes unclear.
モデル提供者の責任だけで利用企業の影響管理は不要である: Users have duties too.

Detailed explanation

CorrectDocument owner, approver, operator, data manager, and risk or legal contact

Decision paths are clear.

CorrectDefine approval, stop, restart, and escalation for high-impact use

Important decisions are controlled.

IncorrectMany roles mean nobody needs final accountability

Responsibility becomes unclear.

IncorrectThe provider alone owns all impact management

Users have duties too.

An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.

AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.3のガバナンス、責任分界、変更管理を確認する。

役割を分担しながら最終責任と高影響判断の経路を明確にできる。

Foundation review

Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.

Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.

Question IDAWS-AIF-486

EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認

Last technical review2026-08-20