Explaining fairness tradeoffs | AWS Certified AI Practitioner (AIF-C01) original practice question

4.2Standard

Two groups have different false-positive rates.

Explain a mitigation.

Choose two evaluations.

Hint 1: Focus on the requirement

Identify what must change and what must remain unchanged. Then choose the command whose scope matches that requirement.

Hint 2: Check each command's role

Separate commands that display information, change state, remove data, or affect a child process.

Detailed explanation

CorrectCompare aggregate and group precision, recall, errors, thresholds, and business impact

Tradeoffs are visible.

CorrectTest constraints, reweighting, or threshold changes with legal and stakeholder review

Adoption is explainable.

IncorrectAny decrease in overall accuracy is always unacceptable

Fairness and risk also matter.

IncorrectHide group metrics to avoid concern

Impact and accountability are lost.

An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.

AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.2の公平性指標、緩和策、影響評価を確認する。

公平性を単一の正解率で判断せず、各指標と利用影響の関係を説明できる。

Foundation review

Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.

Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.

Question IDAWS-AIF-465

EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認

Last technical review2026-08-20