Some production fields are missing.
Treat missingness meaningfully.
Choose two practices.
Investigate cause, rate, time, and group differences; fit imputation on training data and design flags, rejection, or human review.
Detailed explanation
Blind imputation is avoided.
Blind imputation is avoided.
Production gaps are handled.
Production gaps are handled.
Meaning and distribution are hidden.
Meaning and distribution are hidden.
Data degradation is missed.
Data degradation is missed.
Try it yourself
An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 1.2の欠損値、データ品質、異常入力を確認する。Expected result
欠損を単純な数値置換で終わらせず、意味と本番の異常処理を設計できる。Key points
- Missing value
- Imputation
- Reject
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Command output formatting can vary slightly by distribution or tool version.
- Run the example in a temporary directory or process when possible.
Foundation review
Read the scope first
Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.
Verify the observable result
Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.