Reviewing an AI incident | AWS Certified AI Practitioner (AIF-C01) original practice question

4.3Standard

A harmful answer was published to customers.

Prevent recurrence.

Choose two practices.

Hint 1: Focus on the requirement

Identify what must change and what must remain unchanged. Then choose the command whose scope matches that requirement.

Hint 2: Check each command's role

Separate commands that display information, change state, remove data, or affect a child process.

影響範囲、モデル・プロンプト・データ版、検知・停止時刻、利用者影響を時系列で整理する: Cause and scope can be reproduced.
根本原因、検知・対応の遅れ、修正、再発防止、所有者、期限を記録する: Improvements become actionable.
個人を責めるだけで、システム要因を分析しない: Conditions remain.
問題が収束したら証跡を削除する: Accountability and learning are lost.

Detailed explanation

CorrectBuild a timeline of impact, model, prompt, data version, detection, and stop time

Cause and scope can be reproduced.

CorrectRecord root cause, response gaps, fix, prevention owner, and deadline

Improvements become actionable.

IncorrectBlame one person and skip system analysis

Conditions remain.

IncorrectDelete evidence after containment

Accountability and learning are lost.

An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.

AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.3のAIガバナンス、インシデント対応、継続改善を確認する。

個人責任だけで終わらせず、再現可能な事実と改善計画を残せる。

Foundation review

Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.

Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.

Question IDAWS-AIF-446

EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認

Last technical review2026-08-20