4.2Standard
AI assists a customer review decision.
People need to understand and challenge the result.
Choose two practices.
× Incorrect
Explain purpose, inputs, limits, human involvement, retention, sharing, and contact paths, and provide human review, correction, appeal, and pause procedures.
Detailed explanation
CorrectNotify users of purpose, inputs, limits, human involvement, retention, sharing, and contact paths
AI use is understandable.
IncorrectHide the rationale and prohibit review
Transparency and remedy are missing.
IncorrectPublishing only the model name is sufficient
Purpose, limits, and procedures remain unknown.
CorrectProvide human review, correction, appeal, and system pause procedures
Errors and impacts can be addressed.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.2の透明性、説明責任、人間の監督を確認する。
Official references
What to confirm
AI利用の説明と、結果へ異議を申し立てる手続きを設計できる。
Key points
- Transparency
- Human oversight
- Appeal
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Compare the definition with the AIF-C01 objective and the service documentation before applying it.
- Keep the concept separate from a particular answer choice or implementation step.
Foundation review
Transparency
Providing understandable information about an AI system's purpose, process, limits, and oversight.
Appeal
A request for a human or independent process to reconsider an automated result.
Question IDAWS-AIF-331
EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
Last technical review2026-08-20
Report an error or rights issue