Linking explanations to evidence | AWS Certified AI Practitioner (AIF-C01) original practice question

4.2Standard

An AI shows reasons for contract review.

Users need to verify the actual input and source.

Choose two designs.

Hint 1: Focus on the requirement

Identify what must change and what must remain unchanged. Then choose the command whose scope matches that requirement.

Hint 2: Check each command's role

Separate commands that display information, change state, remove data, or affect a child process.

主張ごとに入力フィールド、参照文書、モデル版、ルールを対応付ける: The explanation can be verified.
説明が根拠と一致しない場合は不確実性を示し、人手再審査へ回す: Plausible but false rationales are limited.
自然な説明文なら根拠へのリンクは不要である: Users cannot verify it.
説明を生成したモデル自身だけで説明の正しさを決める: Independent evaluation is needed.

Detailed explanation

CorrectMap each claim to input fields, source documents, model version, and rules

The explanation can be verified.

CorrectShow uncertainty and route unsupported explanations to human re-review

Plausible but false rationales are limited.

IncorrectA natural explanation needs no source link

Users cannot verify it.

IncorrectLet the generating model alone judge its explanation

Independent evaluation is needed.

An example you can run in a temporary verification environment.

AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.2の説明可能性、透明性、根拠を確認する。

自然な説明と検証可能な根拠を対応付けて設計できる。

Foundation review

Check whether the command acts on the current shell, a new process, an existing process, or a file.

Use the supplied command and compare the output with the expected result.

Question IDAWS-AIF-287

EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認

Last technical review2026-08-20