4.2Standard
An AI shows reasons for contract review.
Users need to verify the actual input and source.
Choose two designs.
× Incorrect
Map claims to input fields, sources, model and rule versions, and route mismatches to uncertainty and human review.
Detailed explanation
CorrectMap each claim to input fields, source documents, model version, and rules
The explanation can be verified.
CorrectShow uncertainty and route unsupported explanations to human re-review
Plausible but false rationales are limited.
IncorrectLet the generating model alone judge its explanation
Independent evaluation is needed.
IncorrectA natural explanation needs no source link
Users cannot verify it.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.2の説明可能性、透明性、根拠を確認する。
Official references
What to confirm
自然な説明と検証可能な根拠を対応付けて設計できる。
Key points
- Evidence
- Uncertainty
- Re-review
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Compare the definition with the AIF-C01 objective and the service documentation before applying it.
- Keep the concept separate from a particular answer choice or implementation step.
Foundation review
Evidence mapping
Associating an output claim with the input, source, rule, or feature that supports it.
Explanation mismatch
A difference between an explanation shown to users and the evidence that actually influenced an output.
Question IDAWS-AIF-287
EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
Last technical review2026-08-20
Report an error or rights issue