4.1Standard
Score distributions and error rates differ by group.
A single threshold may not have the same effect.
Choose two evaluations.
× Incorrect
Compare subgroup precision, recall, and selection rate by threshold and agree on fairness, legal, and operational requirements with stakeholders.
Detailed explanation
IncorrectChoose the threshold with best average performance without review
Harm and remedy are ignored.
IncorrectOne threshold automatically creates fairness
Score distributions and errors can differ.
CorrectAgree on fairness definition and legal and operational requirements with stakeholders
Trade-offs are decided transparently.
CorrectCompare precision, recall, and selection rate for each group at each threshold
Threshold impact is visible.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.1の公平性、閾値、バイアス評価を確認する。
Official references
What to confirm
単一の閾値や平均性能だけで公平性を判断しない理由を説明できる。
Key points
- Threshold
- Group metrics
- Requirement
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Compare the definition with the AIF-C01 objective and the service documentation before applying it.
- Keep the concept separate from a particular answer choice or implementation step.
Foundation review
Selection rate
The proportion of a group receiving a positive or approved outcome.
Fairness definition
The stated principle that determines which outcomes or errors should be comparable across groups.
Question IDAWS-AIF-262
EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
Last technical review2026-08-20
Report an error or rights issue