4.2Standard
An AI prioritizes customer applications.
A user must challenge a harmful result and obtain human review.
Choose two practices.
× Incorrect
Notify users of AI use, scope, evidence, deadlines, and contact, preserve relevant records, and use independent human re-review.
Detailed explanation
IncorrectMake the AI result final and accept no appeals
Users lose recourse.
IncorrectChange the result without recording why
Accountability and prevention are lost.
CorrectNotify users of AI use, scope, evidence, deadlines, and an appeal contact
Users understand the process and remedy.
CorrectPreserve input, model version, and evidence and obtain independent human review
The result can be corrected rather than simply repeated.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
AWS公式AIF-C01 Domain 4.2の説明責任、人間の監督、救済を確認する。
Official references
What to confirm
利用者への通知と、申立て後の証跡・人手再審査を設計できる。
Key points
- Appeal
- Notice
- Review
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Compare the definition with the AIF-C01 objective and the service documentation before applying it.
- Keep the concept separate from a particular answer choice or implementation step.
Foundation review
Appeal
A request to reconsider an AI output or decision using a defined review process.
Independent review
A reassessment that is not limited to automatically repeating the original decision.
Question IDAWS-AIF-248
EnvironmentAWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
Last technical review2026-08-20
Report an error or rights issue