A search chatbot answers from internal documents.
Users need the document name and relevant passage, and the bot should not guess when nothing is retrieved.
Choose two appropriate design choices.
Show retrieved source identifiers and explicitly abstain or request clarification when no authorized evidence is available.
Detailed explanation
Without evidence, users cannot verify the response.
Retrieval must enforce the source data's access controls.
Users can compare the answer with its evidence and detect stale or incorrect material.
Abstention reduces unsupported answers when retrieval finds no usable source.
Check official documentation
Compare the following points with the official documentation.
Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Basesの引用・取得結果とデータアクセス制御の公式説明を確認する。
Official references
What to confirm
出典表示と未取得時の拒否を、根拠付き生成の設計として説明できる。
Key points
- Grounding
- Citations
- Abstention and authorization
Notes
- Environment: AWS公式AIF-C01試験ガイドとAWS公式ドキュメントの確認
- Compare the definition with the AIF-C01 objective and the service documentation before applying it.
- Keep the concept separate from a particular answer choice or implementation step.
Foundation review
Evidence traceability
A user should be able to inspect the material used to support a generated statement.
Permission boundary
Semantic relevance does not grant permission to retrieve a protected document.